That's a wonderful question.
I think all first nations, MĂ©tis and Inuit political advisory bodies would be a good start, as well as the existing indigenous oversight bodies within the tri-agencies themselves.
Another important caveat is with respect to indigenous-controlled institutions, indigenous-controlled post-secondary institutions and indigenous knowledge-holders themselves—the elders who hold this knowledge. Anybody who feels they should have a voice should be included.
If you want to do an analysis, it might be helpful to look at the existing SIRC plan and go to the appendices to see who is consulted. I can also say that the indigenous leadership circle in research has supported a recent policy on citizenship and membership. There was a very robust consultation done on that. If you look in the back of that report, there are some indicators on who could be consulted.