I think what we see across the ecosystem is that different organizations have been able to pilot different modalities of research or different modalities of funding the research.
With my familiarity with Genome Canada, I can absolutely attest to a lot of wonderful things that organization has been able to do. My favourite example is that the genomics alliance research was advancing with an integrated component that looked at the social sciences and humanities components, through the GE3LS program, the genomics and its environmental, economic, ethical, legal and social aspects program.
That integration of social sciences and humanities into genomic science is an idea that I'm carrying forward here to say that mission-driven research should have that sort of integration and/or interdisciplinarity and/or at times the lead from social sciences and humanities.
If Genome Canada didn't exist and we relied only on what the three granting councils have done in their regular funding opportunities, we would not have seen the benefits of that modality, so there is, I believe, a risk in bringing everything into the fold, but there's nothing right now that prevents the three funding agencies and/or a capstone to also look at some genomics-related questions.
I think it is a difficult choice to be made, but there are ways of piloting funding modalities that are really essential in learning. I hope those great ideas get pulled into the capstone.