Patients, clinicians and researchers are creating change for endometriosis in Canada. For example, Mr. Don Davies put forward motion M-52 requesting a national action plan for endometriosis. In addition to supporting M-52, we would like to propose some solutions for aspects of the endometriosis crisis that pertain to acquisition and retention of top talent and support for research and innovation.
Solution number one is to support the formation of endometriosis centres of excellence, where interdisciplinary research teams can work together to address the gaps that exist. These should be developed in established centres in Canada to leverage existing institutional supports. This would enable talent to reach their potential and ensure Canada rises as the leader in endometriosis research and innovation while also improving clinical care.
Solution number two is that we must start to distinguish gynecologic diseases, including endometriosis, from pregnancy or newborn-related diseases within academia and research. Gynecology is currently like a little sibling to the big sibling of obstetrics. Although women spend most of their lives avoiding pregnancy, obstetrics often takes priority. This lack of prioritization is not only unfair to those who suffer from gynecologic diseases, but also pushes any interested researchers away from working in this area.
Solution number three is to improve disparities in research funding. As outlined in our submitted brief, endometriosis affects 10% of women as well as transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Compared to the other diseases with far lower prevalence rates, endometriosis receives a staggeringly low number of grants and proportionally low funding per affected Canadian.
Thank you so much. We look forward to questions and answers.