We are setting up the capstone for the one researcher who doesn't know what slot he fits in.
I look at it, and I see that, okay, a lot of these people have been getting money for 20 years. It's different, but basically they've been getting it. Then, they're also working around the world with different researchers, and they're going to the same conferences, so they're already doing it. Is this a failure of bureaucracy, or is this some make-believe thing? I think the problems are right in front of your face, and you don't need to create another layer of bureaucracy by chance. We just have to do this in a better system, possibly.
I have one last question before my time's over. I want to get your thoughts because you see on the American news and on the Canadian news some of these studies that are getting approved. They're studies in other parts of the world. There's one here called “Population Diversity and Economic Development in...Mexico”. It's in some little place in Mexico. Why is a Canadian taxpayer paying for that? Of what value...? I'm sure there's value to the person in Mexico, but of what value is that? There's a list, a long list. I think people in parts of our communities are asking why we are funding these.
The health ones are a different story. I think there are great arguments to be made for the chances on those, but with regard to one like that, what is it? Where's the value you're asking people to make on those?