Sure. I think we should see this as an evolution of the ecosystem. The Canada research coordinating committee was created to start this coordination more organically among the agencies. CFI is also a member, as is NRC, and the chief science adviser also sits on it.
It had some very specific goals to deliver on—early career researchers, EDI, indigenous research and talent, etc. Over the years, we have developed a suite of activities, which I think have really helped pull together activities among the different councils. Research security is an example of a theme that comes up a lot to the CRCC. We're working very hard all together to make sure this is moved forward.
There's also a program delivered under the supervision of the CRCC. It's called the new frontiers in research program, and it delivers multidisciplinary projects across the three councils on areas of compelling interest. It's like a pilot for what we want to move to, so then as we evolve to these larger-scale interdisciplinary activities, the big-scale international ones that our colleague, Dr. Vats, talked about—mission-driven, etc.—then I think what the government is proposing is to move to a next level of integration where we're not doing it informally under a committee but really as part of our job, and where there's a structure, where above it is the strategic committee informing on the strategies for Canada. Then we get very clear and crisp instructions to deliver in this interdisciplinary mode without, of course, debilitating the disciplinary verticals, which will continue to exist.