The period of consultation, as I said, could have been longer, but you have to distinguish the nature of the feedback you're going to get for different types of consultation. When you talk about wireless, you're talking about something where there's a direct, immediate impact on citizens. You want to make sure you're getting the voices of individual citizens on what that's going to mean for them and their pocketbooks.
When you're talking about a structural change to these organizations, what you're really looking for.... Of course, individual researchers may have views, but those views are usually input through organizations and through institutions that have a greater capacity to provide feedback on a shorter time frame, so I think you're getting feedback from a community that's much better organized to be able to provide that input in a shorter period of time.
I don't think that we lost.... I'm sure we lost some voices—it'll always happen—but I don't think it's comparable. Given the importance of the issue, the fact that we launched it in June didn't seem to cause an issue in terms of getting feedback. I mean, if it's important enough, academics will respond.