Okay. Essentially, then—I'm trying to be fair to you and not put words in your mouth—there is a screening based on discrimination, but that screen is based on what other people already working in the field say it is, not based on some particular identifiable definition.
That seems like a problem, because if you have existing building concerns of certain narratives being broadly accepted in certain environments, then you might see more tolerance for certain kinds of discrimination than you would see for other kinds of discrimination. In other words, it's not based on objective, definable criteria. It's just based on what other people happen to think.