We continually hear about this peer review process, but with the 15 papers I mentioned, it seems that.... Who's not doing their job if we have 15 papers making it through that peer review process? We first have the funding granted at the beginning—that's apparently a peer review process—and then you have 15 papers that are retracted later. Somewhere along the line, somebody's not saying something. This is an egregious case with a lot of papers happening.
How do we manage that? From our perspective, the research community is coming to the Canadian government looking for $5 billion annually, so how do we manage that?