Listen, I think all of our institutions are committed to the principle of ensuring that all Canadians get a fair shake, both in terms of accessing a university education should they wish to—which is still the most transformative action you can take for your economic future, and we think there are obviously other benefits to it in addition to economic—and participating to the greatest percentage possible specifically in the research enterprise.
With regard to EDI in the last number of years, I think that in our institutions, like in society as a whole, there's been a greater recognition of historic and traditional systemic barriers, and attempts to get rid of those, to open the field and the table to more people and to make sure that they have a fair shake. I think, in the last couple of years—and this is a pretty recent phenomenon that we've been undertaking this with the level of energy—there have been criticisms of some of the specific measurements and programs that have gone on. We're open to those criticisms and to making things better inside of our institutions. There are regularly programmatic reviews to look at what's.... And this isn't just for these policies; it's for any policies that are going on across the administration, so I think we are committed to it.
In the research enterprise, again, as my colleague said, I think this is about actually opening up the diversity of viewpoints that are able to come to the table and improve research. We know, in corporate teams, that diversity of perspectives and viewpoints makes things better and leads to better outcomes.