It's a great question.
When I started working with U15—we have a committee of vice-presidents of research—it was not this specific case, but questions around academic integrity, fraud and research ethics were right at the centre there. Nobody has...no institutions have a greater interest in ensuring that the system is robust and has a minimum amount of that kind of behaviour.
I have to admit I'm not familiar with the case you're talking about, so I can't really speak to it specifically, but we are absolutely committed to ensuring that our academics are passing rigour and that the studies being put forward are world class.
Again, it underscores the importance of peer review. It doesn't mean that certain things don't slip through the cracks. You heard about a few famous studies in the United States that had the same thing. I don't think it's something you can ever entirely eliminate, but we do everything in our power to try to eliminate it, and I think our commitment to it will be steadfast.
I will say that's the case with all of those regulatory requirements. We handle hazardous materials in labs. There's a lot of regulation that needs to be overseen by universities. We think we do it in a way that's excellent, but the point to underscore is the reputations that are on the line when those things go wrong are our reputations, and we believe they're world class, and we do everything we can to protect them as well.