It is a challenge and, again, I'm not familiar with the case. I don't know which journals were publishing those various articles, whether they're Canadian journals or not or what adjudication processes were there.
One thing that has been an issue of focus, again, for the vice-presidents of research to try to manage these things across their institutions is the pressure on researchers to publish and the advent of journals that may have easier processes for publishing than others and what we do to be able to control the proliferation of those journals if they don't have tight enough requirements.
Also, I'll say there's a balance between weighting that and wanting open science and collaboration and not wanting only a few prestigious journals like Nature and Science to control all of the academic currency.
The case you're talking about is clearly egregious, and I'll tell you I'll make a point of looking it up after this committee meeting.