We heard about another area earlier this week from Retraction Watch, which has done an excellent job of reporting on falsified or poor research. We heard about a professor from the University of Toronto who works in molecular genetics. One of his papers had been cited over a thousand times by more junior researchers, only for that document to be then retracted.
What kind of collateral impact does this have on the people who have cited this work, when it's now basically up for question? How do we prevent that from happening?