As I understand the question, it's about whether using ChatGPT to write an EDI statement would improve the EDI statement. I guess it would probably give you a good EDI statement. The problem with an approach like that is that it highlights a serious problem, fundamentally, where people would think it's okay to outsource their thinking to ChatGPT to write an EDI statement.
I think this highlights a really important problem. When government grants require you to state what your values are that are in accord with a government research body, and that you should be promoting this set of values, what I've seen is that many colleagues are just resigned to the fact that they don't agree with it, but what are they going to do? They've made their peace with it and they will just say what they need to say. That means you're incentivizing lying.