I guess the typical power structure is being changed, and the people at the top of that structure aren't going to like the change. People who might benefit from having more exposure, from smaller universities or early-stage research, and equity, diversity and inclusion, when it comes to double-blind reviews so that we don't know anything, really, about the researcher other than what's on the paper in front of you....
I see you nodding. Could you comment?
I've been shocked, in this study so far, to hear about equity, diversity and inclusion being something bad, when almost all universities that I know—for sure, Wilfrid Laurier University and the University of Guelph—have equity, diversity and inclusion as one of their core principles for education. How that wouldn't go into research has been a bit of a surprise—well, a lot of a surprise—to me.
Do you have any comments on that?