Thank you.
I'll go back to Ms. Morin in order to finish a thought I had just as I was cut off. We were talking about peer review.
It strikes me how, in the last meeting we had on this, there was talk of how many papers are being.... I'm talking now about the peer review of publications, but I guess it comes into peer review for project applications, as well. The trouble with peer review is that there are only so many peers out there. I think we heard there are two million to eight million papers published every year. There are a lot of journals that are kind of spurious in terms of what they're publishing. Maybe some of those are the ones Mr. Horsman was talking about. I hear a lot from former colleagues of mine who are overwhelmed by peer review requests.
Is that a problem? You were talking about going from peer review to peer review committees. It seems you're now looking for more people. It all sounds like a good idea, but I'm wondering about the capacity of researchers to take part in this.