When I think about the potential role that Canada could play as an SMR provider.... You will see as an example right now Ontario Power Generation's decision to select the GE Hitachi, BWRX-300 reactor, which is built off an existing reactor design involving two major industrial partners, General Electric and Hitachi. It may not be the case that there will be a Canadian reactor that would be exported and used worldwide, but the first deployment of this reactor that I mentioned will occur at the Darlington site in Canada. Already there's significant interest not just within Canada—Saskatchewan, for example—but outside of Canada as well, in Poland and Estonia, for use of that reactor.
The economic opportunity is linked not just to whoever makes the reactor, but also to the supply chains that support that. In this case, because this will be the first grid-scale deployment of an SMR in the west, it positions Canada, we hope, very favourably to benefit from that if others choose to adopt this particular reactor technology.
There's no disagreement. This is not something that will make a material difference before the end of the decade. It's not something where we expect SMRs to contribute on a large scale to the achievement of the 2030 goal. Even by 2035, it's likely that we'll see a very small number of SMRs deployed in Canada, but beyond that point, as we look toward what we expect to be a very significant expansion of the electricity system in Canada but also globally to meet the needs of a decarbonized economy, that's where there could be a very significant role for SMRs, and Canada as a leader in terms of demonstrating this technology. I mentioned the Darlington site, and there's the Global First Power project at Chalk River.
We hope that we're favourably positioned to benefit over time.