Thanks.
I would just point out that I'm not really convinced by Monsieur Blanchette-Joncas' argument. I don't think we can compare the number of witnesses who appeared at this study to any other study because each study is different. For each study, we've assigned a different number of meetings. I believe we've had the number of meetings in this study that the original voted motion called for. I remember that in the first study we did, I wanted to call many, many more witnesses, and that was turned down.
I think that if we do this for every study, we will be taking longer and longer. I would just make that original point: Each study is going to be different in terms of how many witnesses will be necessary to hear the full story, and each study will be different in terms of how many different voices we need to hear. I believe we have covered the bases on this study.