Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll start off with Ms. Hull.
I think the work you're doing is quite interesting. I'm just curious, though, about the accuracy of your data. You speak about regional weather stations and those are much more scientific than what you're doing with the citizen scientists. I'm just curious. I'm not saying it does happen, but if you did have somebody trying to prove that the climate crisis was really hitting them hard so it was very dry and very hot, then what would you do with that type of information? Would you accept that or would you consider it invalid and just not use that person's information anymore?