Thanks you very much.
That is indeed the question, especially for researchers, whether they be at the Conference Board or anywhere.
The short answer is.... For example, on our innovation report card, we do use secondary data. It's all the data that you mentioned. Some is from WIPO, from OECD, from the World Bank and from the IMF. We are collecting this data and we're using essentially proprietary models to cut, slice and dice it to try to get insights specifically for Canada. Then we do mixed methods, of course.
The reality is that we need co-operation as part of this. For example, the entire expert panel report that created IPON was a survey. It surveyed probably 50 organizations right across the entire innovation spectrum. We need engagement in that area.
Let me say this. Here's the answer. The government has an incredible wealth of data, and it is necessarily very confidential. For example, let's take SR and ED. You have an example of every single R and D project that has been approved in Canada. If you anonymize that completely and disaggregate it, you can provide insights in confidence to researchers to understand aggregately what's happening. That's one good example.
Another one, when we look—