It's, of course, a very interesting question and one where people often sit on opposite ends of the spectrum. I think we need and can address both, keeping in mind that it takes the number of years that I mentioned to train someone. Agriculture, of course, should be a priority throughout the years, given the reality of Canada's economy, but we can't always predict what it should be, right? I think we need to fund all types of scholarships in all areas. We also need to make sure that we address priority areas, which is why having an overarching science, technology and innovation strategy is useful for the country because it then allows governments to provide additional support in specific areas.
In a nutshell, we can and should be doing both.