Evidence of meeting #50 for Science and Research in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was funding.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Chantel Millar  As an Individual
Padmapriya Muralidharan  Postdoctoral Fellow, Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars
Saman Sadeghi  Associate Professor, Chemistry and Chemical Biology, As an Individual
David Novog  Professor, Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University, As an Individual
John Hepburn  Chief Executive Officer, Mitacs
Steve Hranilovic  Vice-Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies, McMaster University

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Chad Collins Liberal Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

It's a level of subsidy that would assist students and separate those rents from market rents. It could be 80% or 60%. You're saying there needs to be a subsidy with that housing support.

11:55 a.m.

As an Individual

Chantel Millar

Yes. Just make it affordable.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

Chad Collins Liberal Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

Thank you.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Thank you.

I have two minutes for Mr. Blanchette-Joncas.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'd like to greet the witness that just joined us, Ms. Muralidharan, to whom my question is directed.

At the committee's previous meeting, Marc Johnson from the Support Our Science movement said that 38% of freshly minted Ph.D.s were leaving for other countries, mainly the United States. We also know that the federal government provides 6,000 scholarships for a student population of 240,000. After doing some quick math, we can see that only 2.5% of students will manage to get a scholarship. I'd also remind everyone that scholarships haven't been indexed in 20 years, so since 2003.

Ms. Muralidharan, my question to you has to do with the Bouchard report, the one prepared by the advisory panel that was put together at the government's request. Specifically, the report suggested there was a possibility of increasing graduate scholarships. One of the report's recommendations was to “significantly increase funding for students and postdoctoral fellows to an internationally competitive level.”

I'd like to hear your thoughts on this recommendation. In your opinion, what constitutes an internationally competitive level for graduate scholarships and, naturally, funding for post-doctoral fellows?

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

I think that was directed to Ms. Muralidharan.

11:55 a.m.

Postdoctoral Fellow, Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars

Dr. Padmapriya Muralidharan

Can someone please translate it?

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

We have a translation problem.

Could we get that in writing to you, and then you can respond?

11:55 a.m.

Postdoctoral Fellow, Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars

Dr. Padmapriya Muralidharan

Sure, yes. That's okay.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Mr. Chair, could you check whether the witness is using the right channel to hear the interpretation?

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Do you mean whether she selected it on her Zoom?

There's a globe on the bottom of your screen. With that globe, you should be able to choose “English” audio.

11:55 a.m.

Postdoctoral Fellow, Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars

Dr. Padmapriya Muralidharan

That's perfect. I did that.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Could you repeat your question, Mr. Blanchette-Joncas?

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Mr. Chair, is it possible to make up for my time?

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

You have about 20 seconds.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Between you and me, Mr. Chair, I lost all my speaking time due to an interpretation problem.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

I was watching the clock as you were talking, Mr. Blanchette-Joncas.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Mr. Chair, you're giving me 20 seconds to make up for the two and a half minutes I had. The witness was unable to hear my question because of technical problems with the interpretation.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Could you repeat your question to the witness, please?

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Mr. Chair, I'm not certain you're understanding my question. Is it possible to get my time back?

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Sure. Go ahead.

11:55 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, QC

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

Here's the question I wanted to ask Ms. Muralidharan.

Last March, the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System released the report that it had made available to the government as early as December 2022, known as the Bouchard report. The report made the following recommendation, saying, “the panel also urges the government to significantly increase funding for students and postdoctoral fellows to an internationally competitive level.”

What do you think of this recommendation? In your opinion, what constitutes an internationally competitive level for graduate scholarships and funding for post-doctoral fellows?

11:55 a.m.

Postdoctoral Fellow, Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars

Dr. Padmapriya Muralidharan

Yes, we need to increase the value and the number of fellowships that are provided for the post-doctoral scholars. We are aiming that there should be an increase to at least about 60,000. That is where it should start off, as the base value, and definitely there's a lot of room for it to be improved.

We definitely request about 150 new awards, because we have issues. For example, post-docs getting this external funding actually get considered by the majority of the Canadian universities as not employees of their university. That causes a lot of problems.

This is another thing to be thought of when we have new fellowships being set up. We definitely need to budget in for benefits for the post-docs.

Noon

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Lloyd Longfield

Thank you for your testimony.

Mr. Cannings is next, for two minutes, please.

Noon

NDP

Richard Cannings NDP South Okanagan—West Kootenay, BC

I would like to welcome Dr. Muralidharan.

I would like to direct my question to you on the whole question around post-docs. I think you painted an interesting picture of the situation that post-docs are in.

If you talked to a high school graduate and said, “You're a really smart student. You've got the world ahead of you. You should go and get your bachelor's degree, your master's and your Ph.D., and get into academics, get into some great jobs in industry and help Canada with innovation. By the time you're 33 years old, when most young people are starting families, you'll be working 45 hours a week for a $40,000-a-year salary,” I don't know how many people would say “Wow, yes, I should do that.”

You talked about how you have gone from country to country and ended up in Canada. You chose Canada. How does Canada look to other post-docs around the world, when we have funding for these programs at such a low level?