I think it's an important one to address. It links to Chantel Millar's appearance earlier. Those students who have a significant safety net will benefit, and we want to ensure that graduate studies remain universal, merit based and dependent on the quality of the applicant.
I also want to pivot a bit. We've talked a lot about science and engineering, and though I am an engineer myself by training, I want to pivot to the humanities, social sciences, business and the other faculties that we have institutionally. They too do not benefit as much from industrial support, industrial research grants, to enable students to enter.
Again, that is a significant impediment to meeting our EDI objectives and the indigenization of our curricula. These are all objectives that we face; however, sufficient supports need to be made broadly for all graduate students. The STEM fields certainly would benefit from that, and their application can be clear in their linked industries; however, there are links to improving Canadian society and tackling large problems from the humanities and from other disciplines across our institution.