I only have a few minutes left, so I need to move on.
I'd like to go to both of the university institutions.
Some of the testimony that we've heard suggests that perhaps the universities should be taking more of an independent role in deciding what constitutes a national security risk or a threat to intellectual property theft. To me, that underlies an assumption that would probably lead to a more balkanized approach in Canada, number one, and also greatly add to institutions' administrative cost of research.
Have your organizations put forward exact positions on what you believe the federal government should be delivering in this regard, in terms of guidelines for federal funding? If so, would you table that with the committee?