Certainly.
The system is relatively new—it was set up a couple of months ago—so it's still gathering the primary data. However, there is obviously a learning pattern, so the first questions that came from scholars and also from universities and higher education institutions were kind of basic questions. The majority of them were still about China. Now there is a learning curve, so they ask very specific questions, especially about the due diligence to very specific matters.
How it differs from other systems is that in some countries, such as the Czech Republic, we decided to appoint a security manager in each and every university, which is financially kind of costly.
The Netherlands went the other way. It created just one national contact point under the government. It has a link towards all the ministries that may be affected. Also, it has a direct link to security services. In this regard, if an individual or an institution has a question, it can basically reach an answer, including an answer from security services, on whether it's a good idea or not. The problematic point here is that the recommendations from the national contact point are still voluntary, so the university can decide that despite all the odds, it still wants to proceed with the co-operation.