The first model that comes to mind is a program in law at the University of Victoria. Instead of taking what was the normal stream of law at UVic, they created a program that was uniquely indigenous. It's indigenous law.
You'd think, “Well, how different could that be?” Most of the difference is in methodology and how these things are taught. The organizers of the degree program, themselves indigenous, would go to indigenous communities, often to their own communities, and get a teaching. They would bring that teaching back to the school. That teaching was a story. They would then process that story with students: Here is the story. What do you think this means in terms of how it's interpreted? What do you think this means in terms of law and policy?
This isn't particularly siloed. It is a unique approach, a unique methodology that honours the ways in which knowledge has been transmitted in our communities for thousands of years. I think the only thing I can really caution—this has been cautioned many times, I'm sure—is to avoid starting this with a western lens and then seeking to add in where you can indigenous knowledge as it's understood through a western context.