I have just a quick point here.
What I would like to.... Here is a motion that says that we read about this in the paper and we should express our disappointment or whatever. This situation that we see with a researcher doing open AI research where Huawei is involved is an example of something that certainly I kept bringing up in this study, but we never had anybody to speak to it, it seemed.
I would really like to amend the motion to say that we bring that researcher to this committee for testimony so that we can find out what his work involves and how he got Huawei involved. I think that's really important for our study. Then we can make the decision to express our disappointment or whatever, after we know more.
I would ask that we amend that to hear from him here at this committee.