I think this is a very important question.
I would say that we need to look at what others have done or are doing. I mentioned Quebec. Recently, they brought together their different granting bodies under one umbrella, which provides efficiencies and, above all, coordination—no gaps for certain fields.
I believe such an approach is also particularly important for what I would call mission-focused research and development activities. Other countries, such as Germany, Australia, the Netherlands and the U.K., have a single agency. I think that's definitely something that can and should be considered in the context of better alignment and to minimize duplications of programs for researchers. Every time you have a program, you have people applying, but you also have people reviewing. It's a lot for a small country like ours.