Thank you.
I have a minute and a half left. I have a quick question. I believe I'll direct it to Dr. Kerr. It's about open science.
On other committees in the past we've heard testimony that says public money gets invested in research that is then held in confidence or used in proprietary ways. The thought was that this research, paid for by public funds, ought to be open to basically everybody.
Do you think that's a good idea? Would it stifle research, or would it enhance it?