Maybe for the latter part I will follow up with you afterwards with the numbers of those who have applied.
One example would be ITK. I think the members of this committee are familiar with this Inuit organization. They recently applied to be eligible to apply for and hold CIHR funding and were successful in satisfying those requirements.
To give you an idea of what's required—again, this would be for any institution in the country, whether it be big, small, traditional or non-traditional—we require that they are engaged in research, including a knowledge translation mandate, or research training in related activities; that they are based in Canada; and that they submit supporting documentation. It's that supporting documentation that largely speaks to finances. Do they have the support available in the organization to be able to handle and manage the documentation that we do require, like financially audited statements?
These organizations' eligibility is reviewed every five years on the basis of being able to continue satisfying those requirements vis-à-vis the financial reporting.
The institutions also sign an agreement, and in doing so they commit to developing and implementing policies, administrative systems, procedures and controls needed to comply with the requirements of receiving federal funding.
Again, we're open to those, large or small and traditional or non-traditional, and there's a very well-articulated process for those to follow. I'm happy to provide you with the numbers for what that distribution is over time.
They do go on. I should say it's not just an application to be eligible to receive the funding; in fact, researchers affiliated with those institutions have gone on to hold CIHR grants themselves.
Thank you.