There needs to be a price for carbon, plain and simple. It's not free. We release this into the atmosphere and it causes serious damage. There needs to be a cost associated with that, plain and simple.
I think your question is asked in somewhat bad faith, to be frank. As I said, I'm not interested in talking politics. I'm talking about what's happening in the north, what's happening in science, not what is going to influence the election in the next couple of years. That's not what this is about.
Thank you for your question, but frankly, I think it's not particularly relevant.