I think that in the preparation of grants—and this is primarily where applications come from—individuals who are working in the north or with northerners develop proposals. They're doing some of that work from the start. If you're preparing a proper proposal, you're verifying, first off, that there aren't other people doing that. That's part of the peer review process that's undertaken after that.
When the applications come to the granting councils, the peer review committee, representatives from different disciplines and people who work in the north or have knowledge of that would certainly be assessing to see, right off, whether or not projects are duplicating earlier work. If they're not, that would certainly almost always indicate that a project was less worthy of funding than another, for not having caught that.
I think that's part of the key process that we all engage in.