Yes. Thank you.
I said in my opening statement that the CINUK programme and the way we had designed it together as partners had challenged us within the U.K. That's certainly the case, because when you combine traditional western forms of knowledge with other Inuit and local and traditional forms of knowledge, those are not systems that we have a huge amount of expertise in yet. We're on a journey here, and we're just at the very start of it, particularly in the U.K.
When you come to design a program that has U.K.-based researchers, Canada-based researchers and Inuit Nunangat-based researchers, you have to find new ways of assessing the quality of the proposals that come forward. Normally within the U.K., you would do that on a peer review excellence-of-science level, and we retained that within the design of the CINUK programme, but we also had local regional committees across Inuit Nunangat looking at it from from their perspective. Did it meet their priorities? Was the partnership open and fair? Was it going to produce meaningful results for them? Was there a legacy that was going to come to their community from that work?
We took those two forms of weighting and brought those together. I think that's the kind of thing that we'll need to do more of in the future if we're going to do more of these international partnerships.