There's clear evidence. You'd say objectively and quantitatively that it's very disproportionate.
I appreciate how expensive it is to do natural science research in the Arctic. I don't even know if I'd say there's enough natural science research in the Canadian Arctic either, considering how much territory we have. I think Norway spends more on Arctic research than Canada does right now, which is a bit embarrassing, so we could have more of everything. It wouldn't take a lot more money to get a lot more value out of social science research, especially from political science and economics.
It doesn't always have to be on the land. It's more about just going to communities, which is expensive. I think we could be getting more value out of the money we have. It wouldn't take a lot more money to get a lot more impact.