You are right, Mr. Blanchette‑Joncas, but if I may, I will answer the question in English, even though I understood it in French.
I will say the following to you. The government has made a decision—for whatever good reasons, I'm sure—but to be very clear, has it examined every other science-based alternative solution? If the answer is yes, through proper due diligence based on science and science alone, then yes, it's a good decision. However, if it is not based on science and it hasn't examined the alternatives to give our country global leadership in the area of GHG reduction, it's a poor decision.
Personally—and this is entirely my personal opinion—I lean towards it being a poor decision, but that is my opinion. However, if the decision was made based on good, solid science, using internationally acknowledged standards, that's good.