Yes.
You mentioned a little earlier that peer review committees can use bibliometric indicators as criteria for excellence—you just now said, “pull indicators out from nowhere”—such as citations, impact factors, the h-index and publication volumes. However, your research shows that the committees favour certain disciplines, as well as scientific publications in English, to the detriment of francophones, the humanities and emerging researchers.
Do those criteria really reflect excellence, or do they introduce new biases into research funding?