Yes, well, many American universities require so-called “diversity statements” in which an applicant for a professorship has to basically endorse the policies of DEI, including racial preferences, and has to endorse the critical social justice theory as to why there are racial disparities.
I've had students who've had ChatGPT write their diversity statements because they could not honestly fill them out. It would go against their conscience to say things that they knew were not true, but they knew they would be blackballed and eliminated from a job if they expressed their true opinions. That's one of the reasons that many universities—now including my own, Harvard—have got rid of diversity statements.
Also, I think it is a peculiar version of social justice that says that the composition of a scientific body, a university body or a pool of funded scientists has to match the demographics of the population at large. It leads to, I think, rather monstrous consequences, like saying that there are too many Asians on a committee, or that too many Asians are getting funded, or too many Jews, or too many Sikhs or too many Arabs. It is just not going to be the case that every ethnic group or every sex is going to be perfectly represented in proportion to their membership in the population. If we are truly seeking quality, that should not matter. We don't have to count. There may be discrepancies, and they can go in different directions, but if we're funding the best science, we get the best science.