This was a point of contention the last time around, that the committee was dealing with a portion of the content of the evidence submitted and wasn't dealing with all of it.
This was a discussion that we had in the justice committee as a whole. We discussed the idea that this evidence that was submitted—the statements of many others dealing with other jurisdictions and the like—be incorporated into the report. On that basis, the justice committee as a whole agreed to include that material.
I can read the motion if it isn't before everyone right now. I will do that, actually, so that it's in the record:
...that the subcommittee ensure that all [published] evidence submitted to the Subcommittee on Solicitation Laws in the 38th Parliament be [thoroughly referenced] in their report; that the subcommittee consider if additional hearings are needed to clarify previously submitted evidence in the 38th Parliament; that the subcommittee report to the Committee by December 8, 2006; and that the subcommittee have all the powers of the Committee under Standing Order 108(1)a)....
It's basically incorporating some of the evidence that was not submitted the first time around.