I think we need to hear from our very able researcher, who did an incredible job, on what we're suggesting in how to deal with the body of material. For example, on page 19 it says, “Thus the subcommittee refuses to accept the idea that sex workers are victims simply because they sell sex”, and that's what we'd be taking out. We would just be listing these points of evidence or points of view. Then when we get to the recommendations, we would figure out where we agree or not.
So if you now have to take this and redo it, how is that, from your point of view? Are we asking you to do something impossible, or is it something manageable in terms of categorizing things? I think we need to know what we're putting on you or not.