It does seem to be a big issue. It's one we have already heard from witnesses time and time again today. I would suspect that as we move forward, we'll be hearing it again, which makes it, again, a surprise that CDI and the secretariat have been cut, because these are groups that help to develop co-ops and also help to let our world know about them.
In one of your earlier comments, when you were talking about the potential of supply management in trade deals, you mentioned trying to establish more of a balance in trade deals to ensure that the farmers and everybody are taken care of. To an extent, I think that's what we talk about on this side of the table when we talk about the need for fairer trade and not just freer trade. We certainly need to trade with our partners, but we need to ensure that our own interests are being met. We can only hope that the government, in the negotiations with the European Union and the trans-Pacific partnership, really takes that to heart and makes sure that no stone is left unturned, so that we don't end up with unforeseen consequences that are going to be negative to our markets.
With respect to supply management, you mentioned Denmark, Holland, and New Zealand having strong roles and strong protections and support for co-ops. If something happens, and supply management goes away, do you see the government taking any of those types of steps to secure our market before it's thrown into upheaval?