I think what your story contrasts is two business models. One business model, which is investor-oriented, would say there's a glut in the market and the prices are down, so I don't need to buy any this year, so you're on your own, folks; tie your boat up, do whatever you need to do, we don't really care. But in your particular case, they are basically owner-operators and they operate their own boat and they're owners through shareholders of the seafood company that made a collective decision that somehow we have to balance the risk in the management among all of us and we're going to take that catch and work through that particular problem, rather than just simply somebody offloading a problem to somebody else and say see you later.
I want to get to you, Mr. Inglis, because you talked earlier about not taking your foot off the pedal. With the greatest regard to my friend Mr. Lemieux, who says the program came to an end.... He's right, and I don't dispute that when he talks about whether funding has been taken away or not; it was a program that ended. In Mr. Lemieux's words it was “successful”. I don't think people doubt it. And he referred to some success stories. But it seems to me you were saying, sir, and help me with this if you can, that we could continue to be even more successful if we were to revise the program, enhance the program, change the program, innovate with the program, not just say the program is over and we have nothing else to offer. Is that what you're helping us understand?