I think it's certainly true that the closer you get to the ground the more aware the people there are of what's actually necessary. My personal belief is that it can't be a blank cheque. Outcomes have to be part of that, right, because what can happen is the province gets the money and substitutes it for what it would have done if you hadn't given it money. So outcomes need to be specified, and those outcomes I think should be related to broad factors in the housing market, such as the reduction of core need, for example.
In my own province of British Columbia, the province has focused almost to the exclusion of everything else on street homelessness and providing supportive housing. Now, that's a laudable goal, but in consequence, other important goals, such as housing for low-income and moderate-income families, have kind of fallen off the table. So you're addressing a need here but ignoring and making worse another one there. I think some targets and some balance would be a good thing.