Yes.
I think what's important, and my advice to this committee and the government, is to look at other models that are operating effectively in terms of promoting, especially in the promotion of cooperative models. That's why I've pointed to Emilia Romagna in Italy, to France, and to other areas that have embedded the role of cooperatives in their constitution and have instituted legislation, etc., in a way that respects how cooperatives need to be governed, and they need to be understood and entrenched, to make them a viable alternative without issues or obstacles in the way. It also promotes the literacy of the general population in terms of the role they play.
There are certain sectors, especially the social enterprises, especially as government continues to reduce social services in certain respects, whether they're budget-constraint-related or whether it's fundamentally methodology-related. Social enterprises being cooperatives is a great example of where a cooperative model is more aligned at the governance level, at the mission level, to deliver those types of services that are truly in the interests of the people and you don't want to compromise with a shareholder model, which may provide adverse incentives and not the right level of service, etc.
Those are examples where I think it's extremely important that we understand before we develop a framework and structure.
The other thing is I think that cooperatives themselves, to be successful going forward, need to make sure they're using their governance structure and their mission in the proper way and not trying to be like somebody else. I think some cooperative credit unions are trying to be like banks, and that's not helpful to the cooperative movement or the system. With this legislation there's an opportunity to do that, which I don't think is the right thing to do. I think it has to be grounded in its roots.