The biggest impediment has been capital. We've been involved in a few cases of attempted buyouts of sawmills by the workers and find that the legislative environment is actually reasonable. I would say that some 20 or more years ago it wasn't, but that's one area where we have done quite a bit of work with government. At least the cooperative legislation is reasonable for worker ownership in a way that it wasn't previously. The stumbling block we most hit on is capital, and that's not a legislative issue, so it doesn't directly answer your question.
The other issue, frankly, is that it's so much easier to deal with orderly business succession and transitions to worker cooperatives that we've begun to focus more on that crises or “save the plant” sort of situations—although sometimes that does work, as long as you can make the business at least break even. Sometimes you can't do that, and so it's not a good idea for anybody to own it. It's just going to have to go under.
Anyway, I'm not sure what else to say on that.
Do you have anything to add, Peter?