That's another good example. Child care, for instance, on reserve through Head Start and other programs.... These are important programs. They're not always equivalent to what's offered in a provincial or municipal spectrum, but they're important programs. They need strong service accountabilities as well to make sure they're focused on infant and child development.
Around the supported infant development centres that may exist in, say, rural communities in British Columbia, we don't always have an equivalent aboriginal infant development approach, so the children with special needs are frequently not identified until they enter school or are school-age, and even then they're frequently missed.
Child care and early childhood education are key strategies, and there needs to be a strong understanding about vulnerability there. I think we still have a long way to go to make sure there are programs and services. Even just, for instance, nurse home-visiting, good maternal fetal care, we still don't have that from place to place yet in British Columbia on reserve with a strong model. We're always sort of constructing it in a place and deconstructing it. So some of the basics that are proven in the evidence to be quite helpful are under construction, but they're not there yet. Certainly, your work could support that.