It would.
You may recall I also mentioned that part of the problem is that many of those cases do not come to the attention of the police. So even though the work done by the RCMP in collecting information and intelligence is crucial and must continue, there needs to be another component, which is collecting the information that comes to the attention of others—child protection agencies, immigration agencies, immigration lawyers, and all kinds of other people who have the information—but there's no systematic way to collect it.
Other countries have developed hybrid models. For instance, the Netherlands has a special rapporteur, who, at arm's-length, keeps information from both sides. Now, that's important because typically the police cannot share intelligence information freely and make it public, since that would destroy the value of the intelligence. On the other hand, a lot of people working in NGOs and service agencies feel they have to be very careful with the information they have because they don't want to put the victims at risk.
So you need to have a data collection mechanism that provides safety for victims and protects the integrity of the intelligence information collected by the police. I don't think we've made enough progress in Canada. We are wasting time trying to talk about method, and we should get on with it.