I'll answer with one example. Microsoft International, for example, has developed some innovative initiatives to crack down on cyber-café-related sexual exploitation, trying to identify those who demand services, usually from youngsters. I can tell you that the people who develop these innovative activities would like very much to get letters from parliamentarians to ask them questions on exactly what they're doing and any questions about things they could do more, if they had support at the top of their corporation and from their board of directors.
The people who are doing these things would like to be able to continue, but they have pressure from their boards of directors, with people saying, “Why is Microsoft International getting into this business and subjecting itself to pressures from the government? It's not our business.” Parliamentarians can help corporations in this kind of thing, in a positive sense, in giving support to them to do this kind of thing, which is something we in the ILO cannot do, because if we do it, they may be involved in other kinds of things with workers, and it might seem that we in the ILO were condoning these companies. This is just given as an example.
There are all kinds of things that are going on, done by companies or corporations and also by international institutions, that could be helped out by people like yourselves.