Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd like to make an incidental remark, Madam Chair, because I've watched the time fly by and I really would have liked to continue discussing a number of points concerning trafficking in women, that is to say the point that is on the agenda here called “Planning a future business”. So I admit I'm a bit disappointed at the turn of events in the past 30 minutes, on the one hand. I find that disappointing.
Before finishing my remark, I would like to file a complaint with you. I would like the Bloc québécois to have a second round because witnesses have appeared here twice—even three times—and we haven't had our second round. I have a lot of questions to ask the witnesses and I can't ask them because we're wasting time. I apologize for saying it like that, but I find it a bit insulting for us, and even for the NDP, which can't ask as many questions as it would like. That was my first point. I'm going to finish my remark in a few seconds.
Furthermore, I've very concerned when I receive important documents for the committee and I note the use of unobjective words and phrases, in view of the fact that this committee is considering trafficking in persons for the purpose of coming up with a meaning of the definition. We're talking about sex work, etc. Consequently, I'd like to have some neutral documents that don't already suggest a definition.
I've finished my comment and I'll continue.