It's very unusual, during the work of a committee, to pre-empt what would probably be the number one recommendation of the report.
So I think it is a matter of timing. It might be important to reinforce the report and to do the motion right as the report is tabled in the House, but it seems unusual in terms of a parliamentary committee. If in every study we did, halfway through the study somebody came up with a motion that presumes a certain recommendation, it would mean that the work of committees would end up sort of a bit undone.
I don't think anybody has any trouble with it. It's just the timing of it that makes the work of the parliamentary committee a bit unusual.