Well, first of all, I mentioned that the definition used here is an adaptation of the Palermo Protocol, which is not exactly what we have here. But there are certain things that are questionable.
Sometimes live-in caregivers who are brought over and exploited, and sometimes raped, by their employers can leave. They're not threatened in the same way; they have a legal status. But because of certain pressures, etc., they're afraid to leave because they may not get another job, which is important. There's criminality, right, and exploitation. I'm not saying these are part of all cases of live-in caregivers, but in certain cases these have been used, and they would not come under trafficking as interpreted by, let's say, the police, etc. But there are other criminal events involved in it, and I think these people need some sort of protection too, to make it easier for them so they're not punished for coming forth.
As for other areas, I've seen people coming from countries where no visa is required. They promise them things like English language and some work; they pay the way here for these people, where they pay a fee to an agency who places them in an exploitive situation. The people don't get the English and they don't get what was promised, etc., but they can leave.