What you have to assess is the power structure that allows the perpetrators to prevail over the vulnerable. Generally speaking, as the root cause, somebody's pockets are being lined; somebody is profiting from the exploitation of these vulnerable women and children. It would certainly be worthwhile to explore those types of connections, where trade agreements....
The U.S., for example, has something called the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, with their Trafficking in Persons Report, as I'm sure you're aware. They monitor and rank certain countries on how well they are doing in taking concrete steps to obliterate human trafficking, not just to talk about it, not just to research it, not just to study it, but to shut down and secure criminal prosecutions and convictions against the perpetrators.
We have only been able to effectively leverage the situations on the ground—as in Cambodia, for example—when we have been able to bring effective political pressure on those countries by jeopardizing their trade relationships. For example, Cambodia was placed on a tier 3 by the U.S., which is the worst form of abuse--they're not doing anything about it. Once they recognized some serious revenue streams could be interrupted, individuals did the cost-benefit analysis, and the government decided to begin to take specific action that allowed us to rescue 37 girls in that situation. This is certainly a worthwhile place to explore, if we want to ensure rhetoric is not the only means of protecting these individuals.